Content Caffeine #18: How to value links post leak, a 7-figure SEO budget, pitching for digital PR


Content Caffeine

For content-obsessed marketers and SEOs

Hi there,

Welcome back.

My opinions are sometimes controversial, but they're always honest!

In today's main story, you'll see my thoughts on the anchor mismatch demotion and valuing links.

Since I won't be publishing next week, I want to wish you a great July 4th.

Enjoy your celebrations with family and friends!

In this issue:

  • How to value links after the leak
  • Pitching journalists for Digital PR
  • A $1,000,000 SEO budget

See you next time,

Nicole

P.S. Would you like to feature in this newsletter? Scroll down, click 'Pick Me' and show me what you've got.

Insights


How to value links after the leak

20 years ago, one backlink was as good as another.

Times have changed.

As has our approach to link building.

From comment spam to quality guest posts to data journalism, our industry has evolved.

Now, Google's leaked documents let us peek into the world of 'links according to Google.'

The 'anchor mismatch demotion' is only one example.

The problem of anchor mismatch demotion

Anchor mismatch demotion refers to Google demoting links that have a mismatch between the anchor text and the source page or source domain.

In the leaked documents, Google refers to links as anchors.

So, an anchor mismatch is a link mismatch.

The assumption is that these links are created to manipulate search engine rankings, and Google is trying to curb this abuse.

Some SEOs are wondering if this might mean higher standards for relevance. And, I suppose that depends on what standard you applied prior to the leak.

While the topic is fascinating, I must admit that my initial reaction was one of skepticism.

For years, we've known that relevance is assessed in the words within a link, and even over the entire page.

Google's documents finally disclosed that.

And, usually, applying common sense will determine whether or not a link is relevant.

But, there’s not much in the description of the attribute that helps us understand what these demotions mean.

The ‘anchorMismatchDemotion’ attribute—referenced in the ‘CompressedQualitySignals’ module.

Let’s take a quick look at the different scenarios for a mismatch.

1. There could be a mismatch between the link and the content that surrounds it. The spammiest link imaginable. Maybe even one that’s cloaked.

The most obvious case of anchor mismatch is when a link is placed in content that has nothing to do with the target page.

For example, if a website about personal finance has a link to an unrelated site selling shoes, this would be a clear mismatch.

Google is likely to demote such links, as they provide a poor user experience and signal potential spam.

2. There could be a mismatch between the link and the overall subject of the page it's on.

Even if the surrounding content is relevant, the link itself may not align with the overall topic of the page.

For instance, a page about retirement planning that contains a link to a site about the latest celebrity gossip would be considered a mismatch.

Google wants to ensure that the links on a page are contextually relevant to the main subject matter.

3. There could be a mismatch between the link and the subject matter of the site as a whole.

Taking it a step further, Google may also demote links that are misaligned with the core focus of an entire website.

If an investment site has a link to an unrelated e-commerce store, that could be seen as a subject mismatch, even if the link is placed in relevant content on that page.

4. There could be a mismatch between the link and the content of the target page.

A mismatch could also occur between the link and the content of the target page.

For example, a link about gardening tips to a page about car repairs would be considered a poor match, as the topics are completely unrelated.

5. There could be a mismatch between a link and the content of the target website as a whole. Most people assume this is what the demotion is all about.

Finally, Google may also evaluate the overall relevance between the linking page and the entire target website.

This scenario is what concerns digital PRs.

Think about a linking page on a general or local news site, or a high authority industry publication to a target website in a different industry.

But, the link passes all other potential mismatches—numbers 1 to 4.

So, you see, there are numerous things the demotion could relate to. And the truth is, we don’t know for sure.

What’s my hunch?

Google is demoting links in categories 1,2, and 4, but not in 3 and 5.

Why?

Because a demotion sounds more like a penalty than a weighting.

Further, if all were being demoted, then the only truly valuable links would be those from competitors and industry publications.

Listen, links from sites that are highly relevant to yours (or your clients') are, and always have been, important.

However, in just about every vertical, the true number of domains with this level of relevancy or site focus remains quite small.

In some industries, it's as few as dozens.

In other industries, it's as many as a couple of hundred.

Think about the universe of domains that are focused around a topic like card games and you'll understand what I am talking about.

Yet, domains continue to gain a competitive advantage from adding links beyond their core sites.

And, many of those sites are extremely elusive. These sites don't tend to link, or links are paid (which would result in a different demotion), or they are competitors.

The nuances of relevance in digital PR

Relevancy is a hot (and divisive) topic in our industry.

The problem is that it's difficult to define what relevance truly means.

What does 'relevance' mean in practice?

Is it about the source domain being highly relevant to the target page, or is it about the anchor text matching the content of the source page?

My point is that Google's documentation does not provide enough context to understand these nuances.

The impact of originality on digital PR

If Google demotes links that lack relevance, this highlights the importance of originality and effort in your content creation.

That may come in the form of original research, information gain, solving for multiple learning styles, or new points of view.

I've seen first hand that investing in original research and informational content will attract links from authoritative sources.

I didn't need the leak to tell me that case studies and in-depth reports from first-party data are valuable assets.

But, like you, I'll continue to test.

Where to from here?

My conclusion is that everything is speculation right now.

While the anchor mismatch demotion attribute intrigues me, it's essential to approach it with a healthy dose of skepticism.

The documentation is not intended for external users, and we cannot yet fully understand how these attributes are used in practice.

However, it's clear that Google is trying to demote links that lack relevance while promoting high-quality content that provides value to a reader.

Let's not jump to conclusions based on incomplete information.

As SEO experts, we'll continue to test and monitor developments in this area and adapt our strategies accordingly.

There's enough in the docs to support exactly what we have been doing. Right?

What are you doing now?

Reply and tell me what you've changed and I'll give you a shout out next time.

I hope these insights help you. For more tips, follow me here.


Additional Resources

The future of link building: Adapting to the rise of AI-generated content

The content and quality questions to ask

This is not an ad...

We're proud of our results...

50,000 organic visits from our content.


What I'm reading

Google Is Turning Into a Libel Machine: Another reason not to trust the search engine in the generative-AI era.

Google AI Overviews are an evolution, not a revolution: Learn why AI Overviews are just another step in search evolution and get practical tips to keep your SEO strategy effective.


Information

✶ Who to pitch at a newsroom?

Vince Nero at Buzzstream asked for my thoughts on how to contact reporters for digital PR campaigns. Finding the right people is often a challenge.

This is what my team recommends.


✶ Now, it’s a party

Google has postponed its deprecation of Chrome cookies until early 2025, but it will transform your data collection and targeting tactics.

Figure out your zero from your first or third-party data with these tips.


✶ The FAQ on AI Overviews

Will disabling “AI Overviews and more” disable all AI Overviews?

No, turning off the “AI Overviews and more” experiment in Search Labs will not disable all AI Overviews in search.

See the FAQs.


And, this:


✶ Is 'Good SEO' being punished?

Cyrus Shepard at Zyppy conducted a 50-site case study to look for answers.

He examines the SEO features of sites that won and lost in the recent Google updates.


Inspiration

✶ Communicating the Value of Content Marketing

​How to get buy-in​ from stakeholders who think content marketing doesn’t have a measurable impact.


✶ A $1,000,000 SEO budget

How would you spend it?

Ross Simmonds breaks down how he would allocate a million-dollar annual SEO budget. Do you think his approach and reasoning would succeed?


✶ Surprises at Cannes Lions Festival

The early big prize winners weren’t great ads as much as they were classic content marketing. Did they say content beats advertising?


I want to share your:

Big news, latest resource, or outstanding results.
I'd love to support you by featuring you here. It's FREE!

Hit the button
and show me what you've got.


Dates to watch

  • July 1 - Canada Day (Dominion Day)
  • July 1 - International Joke Day
  • July 3 - Eat Beans Day
  • July 4 - Independence Day
  • July 7 - Chocolate Day
  • July 8 - Video Games Day
  • July 10 - ESPYs (Excellence in Sports Performance Awards)
  • July 11 - World Population Day
  • July 12 - National Pecan Pie Day
  • July 13 - Embrace Your Geekness Day
  • July 20 - Fortune Cookie Day
  • July 21 - Baseball Hall of Fame Induction
  • July 22 - World Brain Day
  • July 25 - National Chili Dog Day
  • July 26 - Summer Olympics

July is also:

Disability Pride Month
UV Safety Month
Healthy Vision Month
Juvenile Arthritis Awareness Month
Sarcoma Awareness Month


Keep in touch

12424 Black Hills Drive, Austin, TX 78748
Unsubscribe · Preferences

Content Caffeine

My team and I have been helping brands reach their SEO traffic and conversion goals through content and links for over 10 years. Recognized by industry leaders and household brands as an authority in both organic content and digital PR.

Read more from Content Caffeine
cover design for a template titled 14 elements to include in your content brief

Content Caffeine For content-obsessed marketers and SEOs Hi there, Welcome back. Are you ready for the last quarter of 2024? It's a great opportunity to double down on your SEO and marketing efforts, and get in good shape for 2025. To help you out, I'm sharing a template that makes it easier to create effective blog content: 14 elements to include in your content brief. You'll find the link below. See you next time,Nicole P.S. Did you miss my last newsletter? Catch up on what I discovered...

Content Caffeine For content-obsessed marketers and SEOs Hi there, Welcome back. I truly appreciate your replies to my last newsletter. You asked for it, so I've dug into what Google disclosed about queries and ranking in their trial documents. There was a boatload of info in the 93 documents I read! Hopefully, the key points below (together with my comments) help you plan your SEO and content strategies for the coming months. See you next time,Nicole P.S. I read and enjoy all your emails....

Content Caffeine For content-obsessed marketers and SEOs Hi there, Welcome back. Would you like an inside look at how Google handles Search? I found dozens of details 'hiding' in the Google antitrust trial documents, so I'm sharing a couple of my insights below. Reply with "Yes" and you'll get more in the next newsletter. That letter will arrive after Labor Day, so I wish you a great long weekend with your family and friends. See you next time,Nicole P.S. Did a friend or colleague forward...