My team and I have been helping brands reach their SEO traffic and conversion goals through content and links for over 10 years. Recognized by industry leaders and household brands as an authority in both organic content and digital PR.
Content Caffeine #18: How to value links post leak, a 7-figure SEO budget, pitching for digital PR
Let’s take a quick look at the different scenarios for a mismatch. 1. There could be a mismatch between the link and the content that surrounds it. The spammiest link imaginable. Maybe even one that’s cloaked. The most obvious case of anchor mismatch is when a link is placed in content that has nothing to do with the target page. For example, if a website about personal finance has a link to an unrelated site selling shoes, this would be a clear mismatch. Google is likely to demote such links, as they provide a poor user experience and signal potential spam. 2. There could be a mismatch between the link and the overall subject of the page it's on. Even if the surrounding content is relevant, the link itself may not align with the overall topic of the page. For instance, a page about retirement planning that contains a link to a site about the latest celebrity gossip would be considered a mismatch. Google wants to ensure that the links on a page are contextually relevant to the main subject matter. 3. There could be a mismatch between the link and the subject matter of the site as a whole. Taking it a step further, Google may also demote links that are misaligned with the core focus of an entire website. If an investment site has a link to an unrelated e-commerce store, that could be seen as a subject mismatch, even if the link is placed in relevant content on that page. 4. There could be a mismatch between the link and the content of the target page. A mismatch could also occur between the link and the content of the target page. For example, a link about gardening tips to a page about car repairs would be considered a poor match, as the topics are completely unrelated. 5. There could be a mismatch between a link and the content of the target website as a whole. Most people assume this is what the demotion is all about. Finally, Google may also evaluate the overall relevance between the linking page and the entire target website. This scenario is what concerns digital PRs. Think about a linking page on a general or local news site, or a high authority industry publication to a target website in a different industry. But, the link passes all other potential mismatches—numbers 1 to 4. So, you see, there are numerous things the demotion could relate to. And the truth is, we don’t know for sure. What’s my hunch? Google is demoting links in categories 1,2, and 4, but not in 3 and 5. Why? Because a demotion sounds more like a penalty than a weighting. Further, if all were being demoted, then the only truly valuable links would be those from competitors and industry publications. Listen, links from sites that are highly relevant to yours (or your clients') are, and always have been, important. However, in just about every vertical, the true number of domains with this level of relevancy or site focus remains quite small. In some industries, it's as few as dozens. In other industries, it's as many as a couple of hundred. Think about the universe of domains that are focused around a topic like card games and you'll understand what I am talking about. Yet, domains continue to gain a competitive advantage from adding links beyond their core sites. And, many of those sites are extremely elusive. These sites don't tend to link, or links are paid (which would result in a different demotion), or they are competitors. The nuances of relevance in digital PRRelevancy is a hot (and divisive) topic in our industry. The problem is that it's difficult to define what relevance truly means. What does 'relevance' mean in practice? Is it about the source domain being highly relevant to the target page, or is it about the anchor text matching the content of the source page? My point is that Google's documentation does not provide enough context to understand these nuances. The impact of originality on digital PRIf Google demotes links that lack relevance, this highlights the importance of originality and effort in your content creation. That may come in the form of original research, information gain, solving for multiple learning styles, or new points of view. I've seen first hand that investing in original research and informational content will attract links from authoritative sources. I didn't need the leak to tell me that case studies and in-depth reports from first-party data are valuable assets. But, like you, I'll continue to test. Where to from here?My conclusion is that everything is speculation right now. While the anchor mismatch demotion attribute intrigues me, it's essential to approach it with a healthy dose of skepticism. The documentation is not intended for external users, and we cannot yet fully understand how these attributes are used in practice. However, it's clear that Google is trying to demote links that lack relevance while promoting high-quality content that provides value to a reader. Let's not jump to conclusions based on incomplete information. As SEO experts, we'll continue to test and monitor developments in this area and adapt our strategies accordingly. There's enough in the docs to support exactly what we have been doing. Right? What are you doing now? Reply and tell me what you've changed and I'll give you a shout out next time. I hope these insights help you. For more tips, follow me here. Additional ResourcesThe future of link building: Adapting to the rise of AI-generated content
|
|
Content Caffeine
My team and I have been helping brands reach their SEO traffic and conversion goals through content and links for over 10 years. Recognized by industry leaders and household brands as an authority in both organic content and digital PR.
Content Caffeine For content-obsessed marketers and SEOs Hi there, Welcome back. I truly appreciate your replies to my last newsletter. You asked for it, so I've dug into what Google disclosed about queries and ranking in their trial documents. There was a boatload of info in the 93 documents I read! Hopefully, the key points below (together with my comments) help you plan your SEO and content strategies for the coming months. See you next time,Nicole P.S. I read and enjoy all your emails....
Content Caffeine For content-obsessed marketers and SEOs Hi there, Welcome back. Would you like an inside look at how Google handles Search? I found dozens of details 'hiding' in the Google antitrust trial documents, so I'm sharing a couple of my insights below. Reply with "Yes" and you'll get more in the next newsletter. That letter will arrive after Labor Day, so I wish you a great long weekend with your family and friends. See you next time,Nicole P.S. Did a friend or colleague forward...
Content Caffeine For content-obsessed marketers and SEOs Hi there, Welcome back. Today, I'm sharing our latest poll results (below). But first… Holy moly! Google lost the antitrust trial! (Check the comments on my post). Google will appeal, but I'll give you my opinion on the situation soon. See you next time,Nicole P.S. Drop a question re the Google lawsuit on this post and I'll give you my thoughts in the next newsletter. Thank you! Poll Results Thanks for your feedback. I'll keep fine...